As diplomats and officials gathered in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, one pressing question dominated: who will lead the U.S. in 2025? The outcome of the presidential election carries global implications, particularly in areas like climate change, global health, and international cooperation. The choice between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump represents two vastly different approaches to these critical issues.
Vice President Kamala Harris advocates for multilateralism and global cooperation, recognizing that challenges like pandemics and antimicrobial resistance require collective action. In contrast, former President Donald Trump’s previous administration embraced isolationism, dismantling units focused on pandemic preparedness and withdrawing from key international agreements like the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization (WHO). Trump has indicated that, if re-elected, he may again withdraw the U.S. from the WHO, a move that could severely impact global public health efforts.
The stakes are especially high when it comes to climate change. Harris has prioritized swift action to reduce emissions and transition to renewable energy, while Trump has consistently downplayed the climate crisis, advocating for fossil fuel development. This stark contrast highlights the broader implications of U.S. leadership in global development and environmental stewardship.
The next president’s decisions will shape not only the future of the U.S. but also the health and well-being of millions around the world. Whether the country engages with international partners or retreats from global responsibility will have far-reaching consequences.
