The High Court judge presiding over the murder trial of Ousainou Bojang has denied a request by the prosecution to bring in a shoemaker as a witness at this stage of the proceedings.
The judge explained that the prosecution had already closed its case and the defense was currently presenting its side, with cross-examinations underway. Introducing new testimony at this point, especially from someone who had not previously been listed, could be viewed as an attempt to introduce fresh evidence, disrupting the fairness and order of the trial.
He emphasized that the defense is entitled to present its case without interference, and any interruption by the prosecution—after it has concluded its case—would violate the integrity of the legal process. He also noted that comparing this request to involving a mobile phone technician in similar circumstances was inappropriate, as the situations were not alike.
The judge further stated that the prosecution must adhere to procedural timelines and that any deviations, particularly during crucial stages such as cross-examination, could undermine the rights of the accused and the fairness of the trial.
However, he mentioned that if the prosecution still intends to pursue this line of questioning, it must do so through a formal application supported by legal justification in line with criminal procedure, allowing the court to assess its relevance and fairness.
Ousainou Bojang is accused of killing two police officers and injuring a third. He has pleaded not guilty. During the trial, shoes presented by the prosecution as belonging to him were found not to fit when he tried them on in court.
The defense objected to the request for the shoemaker’s testimony, arguing that it was irregular since the prosecution had already concluded its presentation.
